Who Clearly Payments Is
Clearly Payments is a Canadian-founded, BC-based payment processor targeting businesses that are overpaying on Stripe or Square flat rates and want true interchange-plus pricing. The company was founded with a direct-to-merchant model โ no ISO resellers, transparent pricing posted online, no long-term contracts.
The back-end acquiring is underwritten by Fiserv and Elavon โ two of the major global acquirers. This is a different structure from Helcim, which has built its own acquiring infrastructure. The Fiserv/Elavon underwriting gives Clearly Payments access to specialized merchant category approvals โ including cannabis โ that Helcim's own acquiring doesn't support.
Clearly Payments is not a large company. It operates with a lean team and competes primarily on price and accessibility. That has trade-offs, covered below.
Pricing
Clearly Payments uses interchange-plus pricing, and unlike many processors, they publish it. Current rates:
- Card-present (tap, dip, swipe): Interchange + 0.20% + $0.10 per transaction
- Card-not-present (e-commerce): Interchange + 0.30% + $0.15 per transaction
- No monthly fee at most volume levels
- No setup fee, no cancellation fee
How does that compare to Helcim? Helcim uses a tiered interchange-plus schedule where the markup decreases as monthly volume increases:
- Under $50,000/month: Interchange + 0.50% + $0.25 (card-not-present)
- $50,001โ$150,000/month: Interchange + 0.40% + $0.20
- $150,001โ$300,000/month: Interchange + 0.25% + $0.15
- Over $300,000/month: Interchange + 0.15% + $0.08
At lower volumes (under $50K/month), Clearly Payments is notably cheaper than Helcim for card-not-present transactions. At higher volumes, Helcim's tiered discounts take over and Helcim wins on price. The crossover point depends on your card mix, but for most merchants doing $20Kโ$50K/month, Clearly Payments is worth the comparison.
Both processors are significantly cheaper than Stripe (2.9% + $0.30 flat) or Square (2.65% flat) at any meaningful volume.
Cannabis Dispensary Support
Cannabis has been federally legal in Canada since October 2018. Despite this, most Canadian payment processors still decline to underwrite cannabis retailers for credit card processing. They'll accept Interac debit, but credit card acceptance requires acquirer approval โ and most acquirers remain conservative due to US federal law complications for cross-border card networks.
Clearly Payments explicitly accepts licensed cannabis dispensaries in Canada for credit card processing. This is underwritten through Fiserv's cannabis-approved merchant category framework. Very few Canadian processors offer this.
The practical implication: a licensed cannabis retailer in BC, Ontario, or Alberta can accept Visa and Mastercard in-store through Clearly Payments. The same retailer would be declined by Helcim, would get inconsistent results through Moneris, and would be limited to debit-only through most other Canadian options.
For cannabis dispensaries specifically, Clearly Payments is the most accessible mainstream Canadian processor to approach first. See the detailed cannabis dispensary payment processing guide for the full landscape.
Application and Onboarding
Clearly Payments accepts applications online and claims a one business day approval timeline for standard merchants. The application asks for standard business verification: business registration, void cheque, ID.
The underwriting is more accessible than Helcim's for certain merchant categories. Helcim has stricter category restrictions โ particularly for high-risk or regulated industries. Clearly Payments, backed by Fiserv's broader merchant category approvals, can underwrite some merchants that Helcim would decline.
This is a meaningful differentiator beyond cannabis. Firearms retailers, vape shops, certain supplement sellers, and other merchants in legally grey but federally compliant categories may find Clearly Payments more approachable than Helcim.
Terminal Options
Clearly Payments offers Ingenico and PAX terminals for card-present businesses. Both brands are industry-standard โ the same hardware used by Moneris, TD, and other major processors.
Terminal options are functional but the ecosystem is less polished than Helcim's. Helcim has invested in its own card reader hardware (the Helcim Card Reader), a dedicated mobile app, and tight POS software integration. Clearly Payments uses third-party hardware with less cohesive onboarding documentation.
For businesses where the terminal is just a terminal โ tap-to-pay, dip, and go โ the hardware gap doesn't matter much. For merchants wanting a more integrated POS experience, Helcim's hardware ecosystem is more complete.
Integration Ecosystem
Clearly Payments has an API and integrates with major POS systems, but the integration library is thinner than Helcim's. Helcim supports QuickBooks, WooCommerce, and has a well-documented developer API with sandbox environment, webhooks, and a hosted payments page builder.
Clearly Payments' developer documentation is functional but less comprehensive. The sandbox is available but less detailed in its coverage of edge cases and error codes. For developers building custom integrations, Helcim is the stronger choice.
For merchants using standard POS systems and not requiring custom integrations, the gap is less significant. Both processors cover the common use cases.
Customer Support
Clearly Payments offers Canadian-based phone and email support. Merchant reviews โ particularly from smaller businesses in the $10Kโ$100K/month range โ report positive experiences with support responsiveness. Being a smaller company, there's less call centre overhead and more direct access to knowledgeable staff.
This is an area where Helcim also performs well; both companies have reputations for better merchant support than the bank-owned processors (Moneris, TD, BMO). The difference is likely marginal for most merchants.
Clearly Payments vs Helcim: Direct Comparison
| Factor | Clearly Payments | Helcim |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Interchange+ (fixed markup) | Interchange+ (volume tiers) |
| Best price at <$50K/month | โ Usually lower | โ Higher at low volumes |
| Best price at $150K+/month | โ Fixed markup wins less | โ Tiered discount kicks in |
| Cannabis dispensaries | โ Accepted | โ Not accepted |
| Developer platform / API | โ ๏ธ Basic API, lighter docs | โ Full API, sandbox, webhooks |
| Native integrations | โ ๏ธ Fewer | โ More (QuickBooks, WooCommerce) |
| Hardware ecosystem | โ ๏ธ Third-party terminals | โ Proprietary card reader + app |
| Onboarding resources | โ ๏ธ Standard | โ Detailed documentation |
| Application accessibility | โ More permissive categories | โ ๏ธ Stricter underwriting |
| Canadian-owned acquirer | โ Fiserv / Elavon back-end | โ Own acquiring |
| Month-to-month contract | โ | โ |
Who Should Consider Clearly Payments
- Cannabis dispensaries โ this is the clearest use case; very few alternatives exist for credit card processing
- Low-to-mid volume merchants ($5Kโ$50K/month) who want interchange-plus and find Helcim's entry-level markup too high
- Merchants in regulated but legal categories that Helcim's underwriting declines
- Businesses that don't need complex integrations and just want transparent card processing
Who Should Look at Helcim Instead
- Higher-volume merchants where Helcim's volume tiers produce better rates
- Developers building custom payment integrations โ Helcim's API is more mature
- Merchants needing native QuickBooks or WooCommerce integration
- Businesses that value a fully Canadian-owned acquiring chain
Verdict
Clearly Payments is a legitimate Canadian processor doing the work of making interchange-plus accessible to smaller merchants. It's not as polished as Helcim โ the integrations are thinner, the developer experience is lighter, and the hardware ecosystem is less cohesive.
But for cannabis dispensaries, it's the obvious first call. And for general merchants under $50K/month who want transparent pricing without Helcim's higher entry-level markup, it's worth the comparison.
Don't let the smaller company size put you off; the Fiserv/Elavon back-end provides the same underlying financial stability as any major processor. The risk is operational โ support capacity and product development pace โ not financial.